| |
More Detritus From Puzzled
Posted by Dissident on 2002-January-30 12:26:47, Wednesday
In reply to More Smoke From Dissident. posted by Puzzled on 2002-January-30 09:38:18, Wednesday
 |
|
|
|
|
The accusation you made was:
"just because you believe you would end up acting out dark fantasies in RL, does not mean that we will all end up doing so."
This is the point I have commented on throughout. You try to make a bunch of other different, unrelated complaints here in the hope that something in your miles of text will stick, but the fact remains that THIS accusation that you made has no basis in reality.?
Puzz, you are making a mountain out of a molehill for the purpose of attacking a certain attitude of mine towards such comments as seen in SMG's posts, and you know it. Those complaints were NOT unrelated, because if you would have listened to my explanation, you would have seen that I was responding to the OVERALL tone of her post, and it was THAT which colored all of my responses to the rest of her points, INCLUDING the one you cite up above.
Oh yeah. For all your "I did not like the TONE of her post" crap, you have shown no evidence of a negative tone. In fact, if you look at here wording carefully (as I am sure you don't - you prefer to project an interpretation) she used simple declarative sentences of a first-person sort. Hardly ones loaded with a negative tone. For example: [blah, blah, blah]
Um, Puzz...they sound negative to me, and this was NOT "projection" on my part, a silly accusation. You also seem to forget that when I read her post, my attitude was colored by what I read in SMG's post, and I was angry to see her agreeing with him...something that I apologized to her about, oh great pontiff.
All simple sentences or clauses. All (but one) are in the first person. None that accuse you or anyone else of having dark fantasies or that you or others ever act on them. The fact that you have made this bullshit accusation and bullied her ("please don't be angry") into apologizing are beyond dispute to any reasonable person.
"Bullied her into apologizing"???? Puzz, you are on such a high moral high horse here that I'm actually starting to worry that you may be suffering from oxygen deprivation...when you say "beyond dispute of any reasonable person," this is Puzzlese (your personal language) for "beyond dispute by ME, who can't stand anyone being curt with a certain type of MAA." You have COMPLETELY ignored the fact that I apologized to her, as well, AND the fact that I admitted I was overly angry after reading SMG's post. You are totally focusing on this one thing, because it's the only thing that you have the most remote chance of using to "prove" your own "bullshit accusations." The only thing here "beyond dispute by any reasonable person" is that you are being a self-righeous putz, as you sometimes are, when you are not putting up good and incisive posts (which you usually do).
:|~ *bllllaaaattttt!!!!!* Yes, I admit that the raspberry I just gave you was a bit immature, Puzz, but I'm sorry...I think you deserved it.
Respectfully,
--Dissident
|
|
 |
|
 |
|
|
