Presented the other side of the abuse industry.

About how anybody can be accused of child molestation, and be considered guilty, until proven innocent. Occasionally you do see the complete story in the media, about how the abuse industry is more about it's own self-perpetuation.

An innocent man spent 20 years behind bars, because children were coached to lie. Shouldn't the people who coached them be tried, and if found guilty, imprisoned? They caused this one man far more anguish than anything the children supposedly went through, yet they are free to do more of the same.

And you see what anguish the people went through, as children and adults, because they were forced to lie. Which they wouldn't have gone through, if they were allowed to tell the truth. And if the people who caused them to lie had respect for the truth.

The children went through so much, because they were forced to lie, AND an innocent man went through 20 years behind bars, because of a lie. So, the people who were supposedly out to "save the children", in reality, only did the opposite. Who should be in jail now?

It's good that the other side (reality) is bieng heard. Apparently, the abuse industry has been around so long now, that they can be examined at something of a critical distance, and seen as the self-serving body which they are.

Of course, anybody who is accused has to be pure as the driven snow. The validity of children as bieng anything but scarred for life, because of any sexual contact is never challenged.

So far, CNBC hasn't challenged the pathological belief which is prominent in the U.S. that children can be beaten and kicked around, and get through it reasonably OK, but that the slightest sexual contact is horrendous and will undeniably scar them for life.