And then there are those equally "illogical, knee-jerk reaction"aries, who make the "patently nonsensical" "suggestion" that whenever someone "externalise[s] [his] desires" "involving children" that it is always, by definition "actual abuse" regardless of the wishes of the child, therefore "justifying their crushing of our human rights and freedom of sexual expression that should be our birthright."

Gee, I wonder where we might find someone who fits that description.