If one disagrees? It really depends, now doesn't it? I will, of course, congratulate you both on being uneducated bigots, though. Pedophilia itself is not illegal (yet), and therefor bluebolt's entire statement is false. That is to say that it is false unless you are referring to criminal pedophilia, which is a hate-crime style name for the blanket charge of child molestation and has virtually nothing to do with pedophilia.
As far as offending pedophiles goes, what about it? The one in question may not be the most well spoken or rational when it comes to debating these issues, but he has every right to be offended by anyone putting him in the same boat as criminals. Declaring "pedophile" to be syonymous with "child molestor" is no different than declaring "heterosexual" to be synonymous with "rapist". I, of course, realize that you will agrue against this until you are blue in the face, but it will not change the fact that it is true.
In regards to the NVD party, not even pedophiles are in agreement on them. You also seem to have missed where they are for a great number of things other than pedophile's rights. It is quite interesting indeed that you focus on a hand full of policies rather than the whole.
Am I to assume, then, that since you cried out in rage over the topics regarding healthy human sexuality you are against it? Since it is the only thing that you railed again, am I to assume that you are pro-sex with animals? Perhaps you're a vegetarian and support their cause to eliminate the killing of animals for human consumption.
All except for the first one, the answer is "of course not". I say except the first one because you obviously are against healthy human sexuality. You are also against children's rights, obviously.
Perhaps the most intriguing part of it all is that you posted this hate-group rhetoric on a public blog and really expected nothing but support. I see that you are a mother of 2. I do feel incredibly sorry for your children, and I wish them the best luck in overcoming a toxic home environment run by someone who such a vocal advocate of hate and prejudice.
Admittedly, I was going for a point and a rise more than serious debate. This person is one of those die-hard antis that censors the other side, then pseudo-quotes them to spin more rhetoric. There is no actual reasoning with this person. Incidentally, I did leave a second comment along the lines of:
Very cute that you moderate comments, by the way. Censorship is but a stepping stone along the path to fascist dictatorship. Sieg Heil, madame.
Is that the correct spelling: Sieg Heil? Wikipedia seems to think so. C'est la vie.
Demosthenes
|