Very interesting...

Thanks for the article...

I'd also like to see an internet half full of kp, albeit maybe not for the same reasons...

It's also nice to see how they are coming to realise that no kids are protected by attacking distribution...

As for the usenet comment, yes, they probably don't hang around in the right places. Anyone who has been convicted can explain you that kp does indeed exist. Of course, part of the problem might be conflicting definitions of kp. A lolicon group legal in the US and UK will get you time in Canada. Simple nudes will get you time in some places, while in others you'll need actual contact or genital focus... And so on... This goes for the viewer too - a viewer might look at legally defined kp and not consider it as kp, based on *their own* assessment - much the inverse as how antis like to put even child model sites under the label of kp. But it happens.

Meh. I really think child modelling is part of the solution...