GirlChat #449867


Re: Some clarifications.

Posted by GirlRobo on 2008-August-22 02:29:39 EDT, Friday
In reply to Some clarifications. posted by GirlChat Committee on 2008-August-21 21:43:50 EDT, Thursday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     
However, if one were to speculate, an anti could very well be someone playing the role of an underage girl.

In the history of this forum, we have had dozens of underage girls post here. It is likely that most of them were legitimate girls, but all it would take is for one to be working with PJ. Some posters at GC are very eager to get into off board contact with a new, underage female poster. Unfortunately this can compromise their safety and security.

We would again like to make it clear that we are not accusing any female posters of exposing members of GC. We do not have any particular poster(s) in mind. We are simply pointing out that if someone is exposing GC posters through off board contact, then it is possible that person is portraying an underage female. The truth is that females on this forum are trusted faster and far more than anyone else (by many posters, but not all). Some posters have shared their real life identity with female posters within days of the girls arrival on Girl Chat. It only makes sense that Girl Lovers would be drawn to and trust a young girl, and this is what our enemies count on.


It's common knowledge that this is their most common tactic. It's been the basis of a popular national television series, for Christ's sake!

Thank you for finally making an official statement on this.


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses