has the following statement, which I think most of us would disagree with:

i'm imagining going to highschool where 14 yr old girls are readily available, most times drunk and looking to score with an older guy, GLer bliss...

In this case, the drunkenness does not imply nonconsensual, because the girls being imagined are "looking to score with an older guy". So, that cannot be held against the author in this case.

However, a distaste for intimacy with drunk girls and the idea that 14 is much too old weigh against the description as "GL bliss".

The discussion in this case is not so much of sexual versus non-sexual, as much as it is shallow versus deep.

However, it should also be noted that this thread has continued, and the original poster says that he made a poorly worded statement. You can read all that for yourself.