More on how things have changed

When I used to visit child model sites some years ago they were generally in an index of similar types of sites. Innocent pictures for the most part were displayed on these sites and on the banners were descriptions and advertisements of what one would likely find inside generally went something like this "the innocent beauty of little girls" "the beauty of youth" etc. One could click on such sites and could argue that the banner advertisement wasn't "sexualizing" or "exploiting" the lg models.
What particularly bothers me today is that often if one is looking for non nude legal pictures of litle girls, even these non nude sites are often surrounded with "so called" teen sites which are often in fact simply hardcore adult pornography. That is bad enough but what really gets me pissed is some of the child model banners. So a person who happens to be looking just for pictures of pretty little girls are subjected to young girls in provocative poses on the indexed banners. And the written descriptions on the banners is often worst like "juicy babies" or "hot assed preteens". It's like if you click on the banner to see what is actually behind it one could argue that you are really looking for soft core CP because of the descriptions in the banners. Whether the actual content is like that or not, it was your intention, it could be argued that you clicked on the banner because that is exactly what you were looking for.

It seems I remember reading about a law that stated that if you clicked on a site which implied it contained sexually provocative (or perhaps CP) pictures of lgs, even if it didn't one could be charged with a crime of intention. Can one even get in trouble just viewing some of the banners on some of these index pages?

In the past most of the child model sites seemed to not want to appear "smutty". And this was reflected in their banner advertisements.

Many child model sites individually are fine in this regard but so often one gets the feeling of looking into a cess pool when scanning down the banners of an index page. It seems to me that in many cases criminals have taken over lg photography sites simply because of the way they are marketed. Perhaps I am naive but it seems to me that some years ago one was not likely to find Legal non nude child model sites wedged in between hard core adult pornography. Am I wrong about this?

W