Re: Oprah: The world's richest 'anti'?

GirlChat #451812

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Re: Oprah: The world's richest 'anti'?

Posted by JE on 2008-September-17 03:31:02 EDT, Wednesday

In reply to Re: Oprah: The world's richest 'anti'? posted by Jack McClellan on 2008-September-16 19:30:56 EDT, Tuesday

"I wonder if it was because she concluded that as a person with no child-sex convictions (or even accusations) that I presented too benign a face on pedophilia, and didn't conform to the stereotypes she and her ilk peddle"

I think this the reason for sure. she does not want anything going against the propaganda that is already in place.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

Re: Oprah: The world's richest 'anti'? - Goethe on 2008-September-17 04:00:01 EDT, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- Re: Oprah: The world's richest 'anti'? - Si Sawat Korat on 2008-September-17 04:16:14 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 5)
  - I insist again: we should recruit Foley - nt - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-17 07:10:10 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
  - Re: The world's richest 'anti' - JE on 2008-September-17 04:30:14 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 3)
    - Re: The world's richest 'anti' - Jack McClellan on 2008-September-18 19:33:02 EDT, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 2)
      - Hi Jack - JE on 2008-September-19 17:01:47 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: Hi Jack - BlackMyHeart on 2008-September-19 17:43:46 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)