GirlChat #452647


Re: girls and women

Posted by Goethe on 2008-September-25 14:56:48 EDT, Thursday
In reply to girls and women posted by Cephaloped on 2008-September-25 12:35:03 EDT, Thursday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     
I understand what you're basically talking about here, as I feel much like this too. For me, it's an individual's inherent characteristics that is more important than AGE itself. Age itself is not necessarily the magic bullet to attraction. There can be a whole raft of factors (including age, race, hair colour, somatotype, personality etc etc) that can render one person attractive to another. It's only because modern fascist society has suddenly made NUMERICAL AGE of a person a huge issue and a legal barrier that has made it seem that all of us here put the ultimate and even ONLY emphasis on AGE. And of course, that sometimes mistaken presumption does naturally have to be expected; afterall, this IS a forum for discussion about youth sexuality. It does seem that some minorphiles do put age itself as being the primary or even sole importance to their whole basis of sexual attraction, but it is not necessarily like that with ALL of us..

Naturally, age certainly does play a very favourable and significant factor, but for me it's really about a person's inherent and unique qualities that I place above youth itself. So in other words, even though I'd IDEALLY like to have a partner aged 10 AND attractive, if I HAD to chose between ONE of these two factors, I'd much rather have a sexual relationship with someone who is attractive at age 20 than someone who is unattractive at 10.

Goethe


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses