GirlChat #452703
Re: and this is the reason...
Posted by lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 10:17:45 EDT, Friday
In reply to Re: and this is the reason... posted by Dissident on 2008-September-26 09:47:45 EDT, Friday
Not really.
They didn't and don't have freedom of trade in final products or freedom of trade or movement of factors of production. They didn't and don't have a taxless, subsidy-less economy.
And no - I can think of particular examples where even the least encompassing measure - private property, isn't respected...
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: and this is the reason... - Dissident on 2008-September-26 10:29:53 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 7)
- and a small note on currency / monetary policy - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 11:35:55 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- yes, but none of which = kapitalism |nt| - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 11:24:08 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 5)
- I think those 3 factors describe it -nt - Dissident on 2008-September-26 11:33:37 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 11:41:18 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - Dissident on 2008-September-26 11:43:44 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 21:36:24 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - Dissident on 2008-September-26 23:51:55 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 21:36:24 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - Dissident on 2008-September-26 11:43:44 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 11:41:18 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- I think those 3 factors describe it -nt - Dissident on 2008-September-26 11:33:37 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 4)