Re: and this is the reason...

GirlChat #452706

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Re: and this is the reason...

Posted by Dissident on 2008-September-26 10:29:53 EDT, Friday

In reply to Re: and this is the reason... posted by lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 10:17:45 EDT, Friday

But they still have money, i.e., currency in a form similar to what we use here. They have a state, which can own property in the name of the few as opposed to such property being owned by society as a whole. This form of "public" property is no different from private property in that a few control these industries largely on behalf of maintaining the power and privilege of that few. And lastly, they have society divided into different social classes, haves and have nots, with the latter doing the lion's share of the work and the former giving all of the orders.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

and a small note on currency / monetary policy - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 11:35:55 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
yes, but none of which = kapitalism |nt| - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 11:24:08 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 5)
- I think those 3 factors describe it -nt - Dissident on 2008-September-26 11:33:37 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 4)
  - Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 11:41:18 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 3)
    - Re: Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - Dissident on 2008-September-26 11:43:44 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 2)
      - Re: Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - lgsinmyheart on 2008-September-26 21:36:24 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: Imperial Rome, Persia or China??? - Dissident on 2008-September-26 23:51:55 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)