Re: I have a question for you

PJ has to date not published an address I was actually living at [edit]. I haven't monitored AZ as much, but to my knowledge they have only published the license number of my old car -- which I sold about a year ago (I haven't driven since). However, I suspect they got that info from the controversial "press release" on me that the Santa Monica Police Department issued last year. I showed that to a guy who from Inside Edition who was interviewing me at the time, and he thought I had a valid lawsuit complaint against Santa Monica for that, and that I should pursue it. However, I soon became distracted by a bigger battle to fight the controversial civil order that eventually forced me out of California (and which was taken up by an attorney and is still winding its way through the court system down there).

My feeling on all this is that anti outfits who publicize locating information of pedos who have no criminal record (or in my case, even credible accusations of illegal behavior) are treading on flimsy legal ground. PJ likes to say that they get all their info on people from "public information sources" or something like that, but they also have a page dedicated to harassing child lovers whose income is Social Security -- and they have bragged in other venues about obtaining and using target's SS numbers for nefarious purposes -- and I've been told by SS and SS lawyers that SS numbers are NOT considered "public information". So yes, it seems that a motivated attorney could look into this growing "exposure" practice and probably come up with a class-action lawsuit against PJ and/or AZ for harassment and possibly defamation. I was hoping Corrupted-Justice.com (which reportedly has all the personal info on PJ bigwigs) might do something like that, but there hasn't been anything new on their site since May of this year.