GirlChat #453615


a little more on the con artist types

Posted by Eeyore on 2008-October-14 08:32:31 EDT, Tuesday
In reply to Ignorance = Vulnerability. Simple Truth. posted by Eeyore on 2008-October-14 08:01:44 EDT, Tuesday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     
I think as a group (child lovers), we all need to continue to expand on that basic moral code in which the child's wishes come before our own urges. It is (or would be) up to each of you not to accept pedos (not child lovers) who force, manipulate, or otherwise trick any child into sexual activity. It's not only some obscure notion of morality, but it also serves a very practical purpose to those who care more about the latter. Children who were forced or tricked into sex acts are far more likely to be resentful toward all pedos as adults. So if you value having fewer enemies, it is (or would be) in your own best interest to help regulate the community in terms of what is acceptable and what is not. If you're following the child lover's code, pedos like the type you mentioned ought to be rejected, scolded, shunned. If you don't do that, then you're only keeping the hatred against us alive for future generations.

Eeyore


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses
0 Responses