Re: False dichotomy?

GirlChat #453661

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Re: False dichotomy?

Posted by Goethe on 2008-October-15 02:25:13 EDT, Wednesday

In reply to Re: False dichotomy? posted by Hen-Wen on 2008-October-14 20:21:16 EDT, Tuesday

What I am trying to say is that such cases should only be allowed to be tried in court in the first place with a reasonable amount of fairly convincing "evidence" (in whatever form that may be) by a person(s) trying to lay a criminal charge (so as not to waste valuable court time with malicious and false claims). But the final verdict itself must be backed up with 100% evidence, otherwise it gets chucked out.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

'100% proof' - Hen-Wen on 2008-October-15 23:54:08 EDT, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: '100% proof' - Goethe on 2008-October-16 01:27:29 EDT, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 1)
  - 'All cases should be put to the same scrutiny' - Hen-Wen on 2008-October-16 02:16:14 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 0)