Re: pseudo-photographs. News article

Actually that is not the argument, the argument is that anyone could apply a Photoshop filter on his child porn collection and it would be extremly hard or maybe impossible for the police to proof that those are not computer generated images but real pictures retouched to make them look like picture generated.

But having said that, all that argument comes to a pile of shit when you see governments have also banned drawings (i.e lolicon) as it is not possible to convert the child porn collection into drawings only into pseudo images (a different thing.

A load of bollocks altogether.