Can you provide the documents?

"If the subject of an "indecent" photograph appears to be under 18, the photograph is illegal, even if the subject is proven to be 18 or older."

This would appear to go against international consensus, where it is legal to promote pornographic images as if they were of children below the biological age equivalent to 18. I would be interested in seeing how this is worded in British law.

"The jury is always required to decide if a photograph is indecent, even if it depicts sadistic sexual abuse, however the vast majority of court cases (not a "small percentage") involve primarily (and often exclusively) non-sexual material."

Naturally so, as this is far more borderline than the 18 material. I was referring to the reporting figures, that are most probably distorted by viewer-subjectivity and ineffectual reports.