Page 65

Paragraph 1

Worse yet, his hypnosis probably has at least some effect on millions. Jews voting for the candidate...

Y'know, all I read was "millions of Jews voting for the candidate."

If that's their reason not to vote for Obama, I'm missing the point. Of course, the strange juxtaposition could be an accident... maybe.

If not, it's actually pretty well written subtext, although a questionable one.

Paragraph 2

Obama could not have picked a worse list of supporters than Wright, Ayers, the Black Panther Party, Farakhan, Iran, Hamas, Khalidi, Rezko

The Black Panther Party has been defunct since about the time Obama was born, and cannot be supporting him.

Mr. Rezko, a real-estate investor, has to the best of availaible reports actually made no endorsements for the 2008 election.

...but this note is about the author stating untruth, rather than insinuating fiction - which is more along the point of the analysis.

This unknown man is trying to gain control of the worlds largest nuclear weapons arsenal by knowingly and intentionally using a form of hypnosis on America that is the most deceptive and manipulative form of communication known to man.

The association conditioning here seems obviously "unknown man" + "nuclear weapons." If we grant the author the credit that this wasn't meant to be a veiled "Manchurian Candidate" reference, it's actually more respectably overt than most of his works.

Paragraph 3

This entire paragraph appears to be another "if I'm right, I'm right, and if I'm wrong, I'm right" innoculatory narrative.

We are being played like a violin by someone very smooth, who knows he can just play his games dodging questions and avoiding issues until the election.

If you don't submit to my assertions, it is because you are an Obama cult zombie, not because anything I said was wrong.

This document barely scratches the surface of his use of hypnosis.

"If I haven't argued my case, I'm right."

He knows he can promise anything. If questioned with skepticism, he downplays. Then, he goes right back to promising everything again. He can take neutral positions covering himself both ways...

He can sacrifice his daughters' lives in adoration to Moloch.

That does not mean he has

If caught with evidence of his hypnosis, first, he will surely deny it. He will probably stop doing it. If it is prove, he will admit it, but say it is not his fault. Then, he may say...

Stories in the future tense are always fiction. The thing to remember is that it is the author's story, whether he tries to blame it on Obama or not.

Nobody has ever tried to gain the Presidency like this.

False.

It literally doesnt matter what he says

I'm honestly wondering if this is part of the author's hyping up the "magickal awesome mysterious powar of hypnoses" - or if it's just an overt command to believe the author in the absence of the evidence.

because the conscious mind cannot override the subconscious, and he knows that.

That's... not actually true.

Pretty much all pro-pedo canvassing to date has been engaging the peer's conscious mind in review of emotionally-associate conditioning. It works pretty damn well, in fact.

Paragraph 4

Obamas use of hypnosis and mind games gets you to make a different decision than you logically would have, yet he makes you feel like you came to that decision on your own rational reasoning. our own feelings are false.

If your internal thought process cannot be trusted, perhaps the author is hoping you'll be forced to surrender yours for theirs?

Paragraph 5

If a person is willing to be this deceptive and smile as broadly as Obama smiles, there is not telling what else he may be lying about, and no telling even who he really is.

Note that the author didn't say that Obama is deceptive. They just said that Obama smiles in a broad fashion.

Tricky...

so certain that if America was given another four years to find out who Obama really is, that we would never elect him, and that he must get the Presidency now, or never.

Please note that this is the author's certainty, which he projects onto Obama, and not a quote from Obama himself.

Again... tricky.

The speaking style of frowning and angrily pointing while speaking angrily as part of covert hypnosis in public speeches is not used by Obama alone, but also was used by at least one other hypnotist in history who got millions to follow him.

Oooh! Godwin's law! :)

Yes, "appeal to Hitler" - and associations with Hitler - is a convenient connection to be able to make without evidence, I'm sure.

However, the author seems to be just a liiiiittttle too certain that they've won over the reader, if their argument is "he frowned and pointed, he must be a witch." Neither a frown, nor pointing with a finger, is a magical gesture.

Both of them are considered associated with unpleasant emotional states or impolite social challenge, however - the author may simply be trying to associate the concept of "Obama" with the negative emotions involved.