Pages 63-64

Page 63, paragraph 1

essentially arguing that Obama with virtually no accomplishments has more support than JFK did, and more that Martin Luther King did, and that this is unnatural, and this should be a wake up call that something is not right.

Defining "has support" as a "wake up call" is, in my humble opinion, an essentially flawed criteria.

It's also not true that he has no accomplishments. He spent some time as a street organizer.

Page 63, paragraph 2

We know the Obama phenomenon is occurring, and that it is powerful.

1. Object to undefined term, and...

2. Assumes facts not in evidence.

Personally, I'm disturbed by an author who thinks they have the right to tell me what to "know."

To many who see through it, it is a quite creepy.... People who follow Obama with sparkles in their eyes try to bring you into what is a very intense and frightening cult-like following

So, the basic message is "fear?"

Pretty substanceless.

a childish trance-like

This author's hypnofetishist pedophilia is becoming a little excessive, even for this pedo.

religious experience

Here, the author tries to equivocate Obama with being a "false Christ," or "antichrist."

wherein you give up all resistance and submit

...associating the enemy with fear of loss of self-control... check.

Page 63, paragraph 3

The first question that no one really wants to examine, that we must examine, is, what is the logical explanation for the Obama phenomenon? As logical human beings, everything has a logical explanation. The media writes it off as...

IMO, the author is trying to model the experience of the desperate panic of the collapse of denial in their writings, in order to give the reader the experience of (or tell the reader to) have(ing) one.

His popularity is historic already. Historically, with some of the horrible leaders who have come to power through their guile...

Here, the concept of "Obama" has been associated with every despot reviled in history.

Impressive...

Page 63, paragraph 4

Perhaps the best way to know Obamas hypnosis techniques are having an effect is because he is continuing to use them.

I'm sure Hussein (the Saddam variety) continued to use prayer to Allah. It does not, however, follow that he's still walking around.

So, not only has it not been established that the conclusion would follow from the evidence... but the "evidence" is not particularly in evidence.

The remainder of page 63, and the entirety of page 64, is consistent entirely of vile and unfounded ageist prejudice. While I am sure the audience needs no rebuttal, the interesting thing to an analysis of technique to note is that "educated people," noted in the subject header, are never mentioned in the text - the author feels that equivocation to "stupid" children will suffice to disvalidate the humanity of "thems that larn stuff"