Re: I HATE hearing news like this....

"Keep in mind, however, that once youth liberation becomes a reality, your kids would no longer be forced to live with you."

But how on earth is this kind of thing expected to be enforced? It simply requires some kind of big gang or bolshy COLLECTIVE TOTALITARIAN AUTHORITY to DO it, right? Collectivists believe that everything including children belong to the ultimate powers of the state and that parents are merely subordinated and demoted to "foster carers" who are ultimately and subserviently accountable to their overlords--the STATE or SOCIAL COLLECTIVE. Whereas I believe in stark contrast that offspring are the sole, unconditional and absolute property of blood parents, NOT the state or some external cause or some demotic whim of any sort at all. I regard my own offspring as MY unconditional property, NOT my next door neighbours instead, and I feel very strongly and defiantly about this. You see, many of those who are opposed to the age old concept of parental ownership, too often are prepared to support a collective mob and state to uphold their overlording constraints against parents. But this is just one all by nature's smaller paternal power usurped by one big monstrous outside super power of the all controlling state. It is one so called paternal "evil" being subsumed and trampled over by the monstrous powers of the mob collective leviathan. It is the collective and state that enforces annihilation of the naturally intended scheme of parental rights; I utterly despise this and I will fight it at all costs. I see the powers of the state and collective as much much more of an unnatural and oppressive threat than independent natural parental powers. Not only is totalitarian collective power much more dangerous and all encompassingly frightening, but it is an utter audacity to challenge and question the natural and eternal rule of parenthood. It is collective power that I detest with utmost defiance and bitterness. Collectivists and social engineers see absolute parental powers as a threat to their agendas, whereas I see collectivism as one of the most obnoxious and despicable things I can even think of.

Communists are hegemonic and monogenistic by their very nature and thinking, whereas I subscribe wholeheartedly to polygenistic doctrines. I don't buy into the post WWII monogenistic zealotry and I completely disagree with their taxonomic categorization of himinidae as being a singular species. I therefore don't regard myself as part of some kind of "global whole" or as a member of "one single species". I consider myself as being from an independent freestanding race with no connection to different hominid species as a collective. A different race of hominid is about as relevant to me as some fish floating about in the ocean somewhere. I am therefore what you could call tribalistic, and I think lgsinmyheart was probably quite correct when he referred to my thinking as "isolationist". I see the collective as an "outsider" and from this very basis I object to them assuming me as just another one of their collective that has to be "bought into line" with what their ideals, whims and zealous dogmas are. I therefore also see no naturally justified authority whatsoever for those invaders to plunder my property and usurp my natural parental authority.. When their gun intrudes on me, they then automatically become my enemy. If some outside collective ever attempted to seize my property including my litter of young I would do everything in my possible animal powers to fend off and destroy that invader, not only for the fact that I am trying to defend my nest from outside hostility but also for the very audacity of their arrogant and selfrighteous attempts to interlope into my life. If my attitude is to be blamed and criticised, then blame ANIMAL INSTINCT for that, because you will find that almost every species of animal will defend themselves in much the same way as I would. I see my own defiant hostility towards the collective in exactly the same relation that, for example, the Greeks and Persians felt towards each other. The last thing someone like me is going to do is to kowtow and submit obsequiously to the foreign invading forces. The last resort to the true warrior is suicide, many of whom would also kill their family as well so as they will not have to suffer humiliation and forced assimilation by the victors.

If you are right that the collectivist new world order becomes too monstrously powerful as to close in on the lives of individuals such as myself, then we will not simply bow down, kiss its sword and assimilate into it, we will hide underneath the ground for sanctuary, we will run beneath the sewers like rats or to the most deepest forests and wildernesses we can find and live as armed survivalists till the end. If you are right that I will be eventually closed in on by some bunch of invaders with a "cause", then the very day that this imposing collective enemy (no matter how purportedly "good" they claim their cause) close in on us and override our independent will to be left alone, we will all first kill as many invaders as we possibly can, then if we are overwhelmed to the point that our backs are right up against the last wall, I'll revert to the final measure of slitting my entire family's throats, then lastly my own. No collective force will EVER win, no matter how big and powerful they become, not against the most defiant ones such as myself and my family. We will never allow them the pleasure of overcoming us in the precise way they want. We'll will die as martyrs if we have to in the end.