Incidentally, re: hair... (hebes, dont read)

GirlChat #456709

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Incidentally, re: hair... (hebes, dont read)

Posted by lgsinmyheart on 2008-December-11 03:09:01 EST, Thursday

In reply to Re: How to look good naked posted by Audubon on 2008-December-11 02:38:08 EST, Thursday

Hair removal specialists have discovered that if you wax a girl at ages of about 6 or earlier in all the usual places (pubes, legs, armpits and arms), she will only need half a dozen sessions, at most, and will never again need hair removal: she will remain hairless all her life, despite whatever hormones she later releases naturally or intakes, and whatever family / ethnic background she might have.

Understandably, the Beauty And Cosmetics Complex is incensed about people who do it, because they want to have ALL females 15-60 paying every week or month for something that they need only have paid for less than ten times in their life...

(Yes, I'd sure suggest my daughter to wax at 5 a few times rather than have her shave or wax forever since her tweens)

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

[Citation needed]!!! - j_k on 2008-December-11 04:34:43 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 7)
- my pleasure to source... - LGsinmyheart on 2008-December-11 06:53:03 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 6)
  - need better source - and something else - Baldur on 2008-December-11 10:21:49 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 5)
    - Re: need better source - and something else - lgsinmyheart on 2008-December-12 09:03:04 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 4)
      - extraordinary claims . . . - Baldur on 2008-December-12 10:36:31 EST, Friday - (1 / 0 / 3)
        
        Forget proof... - Minstrel.. on 2008-December-13 23:25:20 EST, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 2)
        
        that's OK with me . . . - Baldur on 2008-December-14 04:45:38 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: that's OK with me . . . - Audubon on 2008-December-16 07:10:27 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)