Wikis

I've never seen a wiki I didn't like, but at the same time, I think if there are problems getting contributions in to Wikipedia, it's not necessarily due to the whole "oh noez they're persecuting me!" attitude that comes up. Usually it is because there is an obvious bias and lack of support for contributions, if anything.

I realize there may be a bit of inequality, like a lact of {{fact}} tagging on less controversial issues, but really what's to be protested is the lack of criticality there, not the criticality on these issues. It's to be expected that when people have strong feelings about something, you really need to neutrally and supportedly make arguments. A lot of arguments made are usually just as emotional, I think.