Re: Romantic Pedophilia (3 lgm's)

Ahhh... Those early years were something. I was four she was six it was all her idea I swear, she said something about laying down on a towel. I didn't have a towel in my room so we went to the bathroom. Next thing I know we're having a good time sans clothing when Mom opens the door. When Mom told Dad about it, he acted all serious until he got me alone, then just told me it's alright just always wash it with soap. (Dad was always the voice of reason in such matters. Years later, he would impart to me his hard-earned philosophy about young girls in one quintessential statement: "Son, if there's grass on the field, play ball.") When I was seven, another girl (also six as I recollect) came to visit one day and immediately wanted to "get under the covers." Wow. I know I've been hooked ever since. And the question I pose is this: All those who have any experience with LG's know that they have drives and desires which generally equal the drive and desires of those attracted to them. So, if it is some mistake of evolution that I am an MAA, is it also some error of evolution that some LG's are AAM's? I've had LG's wink at me in stores, look me up and down, etc. Maybe this is just monkey-see monkey-do behavior, but maybe it's not? Example: About a year and a half back, I was in walmart, behind a woman with two adorable girls about 3 and 7. The woman was buying camping supplies, and was quite occupied with the cashier. The girls were just studying me, so I asked "Are you girls going camping?" The younger one nodded, and the older one said "Yes! We're gonna see the fireworks at the lake!" I said "oh cool fireworks on water is a nice show!" and she started dancing around for me, her little skirt flaring out and she looked for my reaction each time she came around. I stood there, grinning, mesmerized. After what could only have been a minute but seemed to go so much faster, her mom said "Carrie, let's go" so I said goodbye and watched as they left the store. At the very last moment, she turned back, looked straight at me and waved, so I waved back. Now, I've no doubt our attraction was mutual, but did seem odd was how quickly her radar picked up on me, with so little conversation, so it had to be body language, or pheromones, or something, and that tells me that this sort of behavior is instinctual (and therefore natural) for some children to exhibit. And that also makes me think that such behavior is NOT some sort of unfortunate error in evolution, but actually serves a useful purpose in our species. I also have to question whether or not there evolution can contain errors. It would seem to me that maa's and aam's would be dramatically favored for reproduction over other, non maa's. As such, I feel my attraction is a RESULT of evolution, rather than an unfortunate mistake. Here's to Darwin and the HMS Beagle!