GirlChat #458013


Re: why . . .

Posted by Baldur on 2009-January-05 00:55:23 EST, Monday
In reply to Re: why . . . posted by Dante on 2009-January-05 00:19:19 EST, Monday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     
I seem to recall an accusation by a guard that Jack had loitered in the children's section, and that given as the reason for the ban. Perhaps I misremembered.

Either way, Powell's has lost my business, and their former good name is now mud in my opinion.




This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses
0 Responses