Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS!

GirlChat #458087

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS!

Posted by Philosophy on 2009-January-05 21:21:06 EST, Monday

I would first like to apologize to the hords of people I am about to piss off. Some of you might even go as far as to say I am not one of you. I guess in theory I am not.

At any rate, I will begin.

A while ago a very close friend of mine posted his thoughts on something that I think is ridiculous. He believed that because he is a peodphile little girls and boys for that matter, were drawn to him. Like they knew he was a pedophile. You know the concept. I am terribly sorry to those of you who believe this is a possibility, but I call bullshit.

Children respond to attention. It doesn't matter what kind of attention. They will respond one way or the other. If you are staring at a LG and she notices that you are also smiling, she will smile back. Depending on the age of the child, she might engage in some sort of play. Like the fellar mentioned a little down the way.

The little girl at the grocery who was flipping her skirt about. This wasn't to give him a private show, it was because she was enjoying the attention he was giving her.

Do little girls seduce pedophiles because somehow they know they are peodphiles? Absolutely not. If they are seducing a pedophile, it is because the pedophile is paying attention to her and she really appreciates the attention. Little girls and even boys yes, seduce everyone because they don't any better.

Do you feel me? Or I am just speaking non sense?

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

Right, so.... - BB on 2009-January-09 01:55:11 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Re: Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS! - kea on 2009-January-06 09:56:55 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Definately on the 'speaking nonsense' side... - jd420 on 2009-January-06 07:37:20 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Re: Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS! - Dante on 2009-January-06 05:11:23 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
MPD, White crows, and coquettish cherubs - MimzyBorogrove on 2009-January-06 04:41:51 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- What a beautiful post! Thank you!! -nt - Dissident on 2009-January-07 07:20:59 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- O_O - GirlRobo on 2009-January-06 10:31:22 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
  - Can I please have the pudding anyways?-nt - Dissident on 2009-January-07 07:40:55 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
    - Re: Can I please have the pudding anyways?-nt - GirlRobo on 2009-January-07 08:12:10 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
      - lol - MimzyBorogrove on 2009-January-07 11:47:04 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- As have I thank you, As have I NT - Philosophy on 2009-January-06 06:43:36 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Allow me to edit my own post... - Philosophy on 2009-January-06 01:29:23 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Epic Fail. - Shenanigans on 2009-January-05 23:32:27 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 23)
- Why would this info be edited out? - Dissident on 2009-January-07 02:10:12 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
  - equal protection clause??? - lgsinmyheart on 2009-January-07 06:25:20 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
  - Would love to know.... - Philosophy on 2009-January-07 06:00:30 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
    - Re: Would love to know.... - Dissident on 2009-January-07 06:51:02 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Epic Fail. - Sancho Panza on 2009-January-06 17:20:56 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 8)
  - To Sancho and Dissident... - Cirk on 2009-January-07 03:17:08 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
    - Very clear, Thanks (NT) - Sancho Panza on 2009-January-07 04:36:34 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
  - Thank you. NT - Philosophy on 2009-January-07 01:50:47 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
  - Re: Epic Fail. - lgsinmyheart on 2009-January-06 23:00:14 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
    - OK Thanks for explaining (NT) - Sancho Panza on 2009-January-07 04:32:36 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
  - Re: Epic Fail. - zlurker on 2009-January-06 22:30:55 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
    - And that is exactly what I said! NT - Philosophy on 2009-January-07 05:48:40 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
    - Re: Epic Fail. - Sancho Panza on 2009-January-07 04:41:04 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Hmm.... - Philosophy on 2009-January-06 04:39:41 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 9)
  - Character and Characters - Dante on 2009-January-06 19:01:09 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
    - Dante = the best! - GirlRobo on 2009-January-07 03:43:03 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
      - Yeah, What A Neighbourhood! - Sexiest GLer of All Time on 2009-January-07 06:54:31 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Meh... - GirlRobo on 2009-January-07 08:46:00 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
      - One more thing... - Philosophy on 2009-January-07 05:59:23 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: One more thing... - GirlRobo on 2009-January-07 08:33:48 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
      - Actually - Philosophy on 2009-January-07 05:51:18 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
  - Do what the ancient philosophers would - Trucker on 2009-January-06 14:11:12 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
    - And to reply to your post - Trucker on 2009-January-06 14:19:32 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Re: Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS! - GirlRobo on 2009-January-05 22:12:20 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS! - zlurker on 2009-January-06 11:39:26 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS! - kea on 2009-January-06 10:04:13 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Re: Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS! - BlackMyHeart on 2009-January-05 22:07:41 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Pedophile Aura? LGs seducing pedophiles? BS! - kea on 2009-January-06 10:06:42 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Interesting... - GirlRobo on 2009-January-05 22:21:07 EST, Monday - (1 / 0 / 0)
But why omit the minor premise? - lgsinmyheart on 2009-January-05 22:06:34 EST, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)