Re: What the F*@! is with this Hag?

Jurors decided Drew was not guilty of the more serious felonies of intentionally causing emotional harm while accessing computers without authorization. The jury could not reach a unanimous verdict on a felony conspiracy charge. The judge dismissed it Thursday at the request of prosecutors. I wonder what the excuse the person or persons on the jury gave for voting not guilty? I would like to here that one. LOS ANGELES – A federal judge on Thursday tentatively threw out the convictions of a Missouri mother for her role in a MySpace hoax directed at a 13-year-old neighbor girl who ended up committing suicide The judge threw out the conviction because it basically was a TOS violation. What she was found guilty of anyway."You could prosecute pretty much anyone who violated terms of service," the judge said. What the judge actually threw out I can agree with, it would open up a big Pandora's box if all of a sudden people started to get prosecuted for TOS violations. But I still don't get why the jury couldn't convict on the more serious offence of intentionally causing emotional harm while accessing computers without authorization. LITTLE GIRL LOVER