GirlChat #473365


Re: What the F*@! is with this Hag?

Posted by Little Girl Lover on 2009-July-03 07:53:50 EDT, Friday
In reply to What the F*@! is with this Hag? posted by Cephaloped on 2009-July-03 02:11:15 EDT, Friday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     
Jurors decided Drew was not guilty of the more serious felonies of intentionally causing emotional harm while accessing computers without authorization. The jury could not reach a unanimous verdict on a felony conspiracy charge. The judge dismissed it Thursday at the request of prosecutors.

I wonder what the excuse the person or persons on the jury gave
for voting not guilty? I would like to here that one.


LOS ANGELES – A federal judge on Thursday tentatively threw out the convictions of a Missouri mother for her role in a MySpace hoax directed at a 13-year-old neighbor girl who ended up committing suicide

The judge threw out the conviction because it basically was
a TOS violation. What she was found guilty of anyway."You could prosecute pretty much anyone who violated terms of service," the judge said.

What the judge actually threw out I can agree with, it would open
up a big Pandora's box if all of a sudden people started to
get prosecuted for TOS violations.

But I still don't get why the jury couldn't convict on
the more serious offence of intentionally causing emotional harm while accessing computers without authorization.

LITTLE GIRL LOVER

Little Girl Lover


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses