Index    Classic Index    Post a New Message    Archive    FAQ

I would support legislation the banned ultrasounds

Posted by Stahntii on Sunday, March 14 2010 at 01:51:06pm
In reply to Where are all posted by bottle on Sunday, March 14 2010 at 12:10:56pm

that determine the gender of unborn children. But then the priveledges folks could always have their ways of finding out. And so therefore, I would not support such legislation. I would then have to instead support legislation that banned abortion altogether, considering it as murder (punishable by no less than 20 years mandatory imprisonment for offenders).

Now this is something even priveledged folk will not want to risk (for the most part).

THat is an effective solution.

All in favor of anti-abortion legislation say I.

Stahntii is on board with this.

But don't dare confuse me with being a Christian anti-abortionist.

But yes, Bottle. Your article has just made a firm "anti-abortionist" out of your man Stahntii.

THis is kinda big. At least for me. Now I have a very good reason to be against abortion. That reason being less females in the world; less precious lg's (creatures that make my existence worth living). If we have less lg's we will have less lg entertainment and less Danna's and Maria's and CLeo's. But actually if lg's were rare, the entertainment business might feature them more so than if they were in plenty. So if that is the case, I will still support anti-abortion legislation simply because it is causing for more males to come into existence than females. And I would much rather the opposite, than for the world to become a testosterone zone. I don't like being around excess amounts of testosterone. It could be very unsettling. Femininity is much more pleasant and tranquil.

Follow ups:

Post a response:

Nick:

Password:

Email (optional):
Subject:


Message:


Link URL:

Link Title:


Automatically append sigpic?