Re: Depends on what you mean by 'accepted'

Perhaps in the far-flung future--long after the last ashes of the pedo-genocide have drifted into the dust--our ideas might gain ground, but would it be on their own merit or because some future society felt guilty? I wonder. I would really like to avoid the pedo-genocide, and in fact I feel I have an obligation to MAPs not to push our luck.

1) We are not a "visible minority" so our genocide will always be far more difficult. (The proof is that we're still alive, as a matter of fact)

2) I am past the point where I would feel sorry to become a PedoZionist.

If/when that is settled, it'll be a different story, but it is reckless to pursue that course with so much at stake and so little understood. Nuff said about that.

Erm, that is how history works. It's pretty much impossible to avoid, because people don't have experience about the things they don't have experience about.

and you equated that to painting a pretty picture? Come on.

The argument is valid because part of your argument is about image. Drop the image issue and it does become a strawman. But when you are talking about being deemed or not a threat - that's image.