Re: Depends on what you mean by 'accepted'

Speak for yourself. I am incredibly visible, and so are many others like me.

Well, I thought the scary thing about us was that "it could be anyone" - something that has never been an issue for women, racial minorities, and even many religious minorities, because they stood out. I know you're out, but if it wasn't for your own outing, would anyone know? Would we even have SO registries if we could be recognized on the street? Did anyone seriously ever propose a Female registry or a Black registry?

I have no idea what the fuck that means, and neither do you, I'll wager.

It means to claim a country for ourselves, buy for chips as much of it as we can, move out whoever refuses to sell, kill those who resist, repeat ad infinitum, and use the collective guilt of those who earlier prosecuted us as justification.

Admittedly, the model was first used by the Christian Europeans in the Americas; but only received a proper, generalizable name with Israel.

In any case, I am past the point where I would feel sorry to have an analogous pedophilic state.

That's a stupid argument: genocides/oppression happens, can't avoid it, might as well barrel headlong into it. Ridiculous.

You should recall your own posts. That was about youthlibby reforms (esp. compared with womenlibby and blacklibby reforms), not about the pedocide.

It was about self-preservation, not blending in so we could pretend we're just like them.

Then he misunderstood your advocacy of image as an end, when you intended it as a means. It is still not irrelevant to debate image if you use as one of the arguments for not opposing youth segregation not to be deemed a threat.

Which is a valid argument. You don't build a fifth column by being open about it.