Re: We've been here before...

Perhaps you missed the part where I said the exact same accusation was made against boymoments. It was said that members needed to post graphic pictures of boys being abused in order to remain members at the site but as members of boychat will tell that was simply not true. If there was any trading of CP it was done behind closed doors (threw pms and offsite.) But it gave law enforcement that authority to break down the doors of everyone who was a member regardless if they actually engaged in any illegal activity or not. Considering how they lie, I have enough reason to doubt these claims.

And you give way too much credit to confessions, especially considering how they are often coerced into pleading guilty to avoid possible longer sentences. Maybe he had pictures of nude children which is enough to qualify as CP these days. Hell, they don't even have to be nude anymore.