GirlChat #541443
Re: The gay lobby is a failure
Posted by Sheepy on 2011-October-13 12:06:21 EDT, Thursday
In reply to The gay lobby is a failure posted by LOD on 2011-October-12 07:55:46 EDT, Wednesday
In other words you are against the exercise of free will to enter into any sort of union one wishes. I am married in the eyes of my coven to a woman. I enjoy the romantic benefits of that union which you do not support. Yet, your own stand is unsupported by reasoning. Nevertheless. I support your right to exercise the choice to express an opinion which is impotent. It doesn't harm me nor does it put my brothers and sisters at risk. But as a moderator I will remind you in an unofficial capacity you are in violation of rule #3 of the FAQ for several reasons. 1. You are harassing me after I asked you to stop. You openly discriminate against gays and gay marriage.
"Harassment is a statement designed to alarm or annoy another person. We all make mistakes and get angry; but, harassment is illegal and it will not be tolerated. Repeatededly harassing another poster will lead to a post being edited, deleted, or the banning of the harassing individual.
No post may be made that discriminates against someone on the basis of race, national or ethnic origin, colour, social or economic status, marital status or family status, gender, age, disability, sexual oriention, religion, nor a crime for which they've been pardoned. Note: such discrimination is disallowed by the Human Rights Act, in Canada, and many of the above categories are also protected by law in the USA and Europe. Violation of this law might be interpreted as a hate crime. Posts actacking any individual in violation of this rule will be deleted and the poster warned. Repeated violations will result in a loss of posting rights for a time to be determined by the Committee.
We're trying to provide a respectful, non-judgmental place where girl lovers can get ideas out in the open. Hate-mongering just doesn't fit in with that mission. If you must disagree, please do so without being disagreeably rude. Again, it is often better to simply agree to disagree than to disrupt the spirit of the community."
As I have said, I am not wearing my emblems. However, you need to make that statement elsewhere. I asked you to not harass me. Your post is noted; and, your harassment and prejudicial statements are herein rebuked. I am warning you to cease harassing me, as explained in rule #3 of the seven rules of FAQ, or I shall petition you be chastened for continuing to harass me after I expressed a desire for you to cease.
If you want to discuss a GM, I'll happily engage in such conversation. I am not marking you as an enemy. If you are after a fight, that is a rule three violation; and, this is a warning to take your venomous statements and darken someone else's post. I was talking to Dissy; I was not being rude to you.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
0 Responses