GirlChat #541738


Some simple truths for Anti's to remember

Posted by Stahntii on 2011-October-17 01:00:44 EDT, Monday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     
Pedophilia is a legitimate sexual orientation. And so isn't kids who are attracted to adults. For example, When I was about 10 I can't help but remember me and many classmates taking quite a sexual interest in the adult females of many magazines that featured countless scantilly slad female adults. I actually, at that period in my life, thought some of the ladies in the various muscle mags were particularly hot. There's one that is permanently etched in my memory who I couldn't forget if I tried. And wouldn't want to try. It's a nice memory. She was fit and beautiful. I also remember finding my English teacher to be really hot. And she was about 30-something at the time and had big loving gazoongas - of which at the time I really liked, ironically.
So there you have it.......examples of kids being atracted to adults. And don't for a minute think that this sort of thing is not still the case today. It certainly is. It's just sad that so many anti-sexers make kids feel dirty and shameful for a million different sex-related issues.
So then.
Anyways.
How can you call sexual attraction to children a disorder, when so many children are obviously attracted to adults (eg.-the adults in the above mentioned mags or teachers or any freaking adult in RL or on a tv set or in a photo or video, etc.)"? To call something a disorder, means it must be against the nature of things. And so is it unnatural or freakish for a child to be attracted to adults? If your being honest and recognize the examples I gave as legitimate and realistic, then you can't say "No". And so then if it is natural for a child to be attracted to adults, then how the fuck is it not natural and in order with things for the reverse to be true (for adults to finds various kids to be attractive)?

And so in a world where this silly adult/child sexual myth/taboo didn't not exist, these 2 differing age groups (adults and kids) could easily enjoy and benefit from physical/sexual experiences with each other. I would have absolutely loved if I could have cuddled and carressed with my English teacher back when I was around 10.

And so in the ideal world, kids (under, let's say......10yo eg.) "who have respectable guardians" could feel free to seek and hopefully obtain, from those guardians, permission to have such intimacies with an adult who was interested in doing so.

And so then
Courting, Dating, Marriages, Sexual Encounters, and General Friendships, between youth and "grown up", should all be considered as socially acceptable and should soully exist based upon whether "those involved" want it. And such relations should be legal to continue for as long as both involved A.) want it to, B.) are not being caused sickness or physical damage by it, and C.) are not lieing to or plotting against each other.
I might also add that when youngsters (under 10, eg.) are involved, the adult should first seek permission from their legal guardian in order to have relations with a person so young. But if the adult A.) sees that the youngster is stressed out by their parents, and that B.) he (the adult) personally knows the parents to be crazy and unreasonable, then I can sort of A.) sympathize for any adult who not first seek such peoples' approval, and B.) a courtroom not be allowed to charge an adult "under such circumstances" with a crime.

There you have it, my Anti-Paedo friends.
You cannot refute the common sense of what I just said. But you will.
Your handicap (your ignorance, that is) will force you to.
It's simply out of your control. You are handicapped by your ignorance.
Perhaps you have a disorder. What can we call those whose logical deduction skills are occasionally shut down or bipassed by certain ignorances and prejudices? Hmmm? It really is a good and relevant question. Come on, now? Be honest. But it really is a disorder. Anyone whose intellect can be bipassed by certain prejudices or ignorances, has a disorder - in my opinion. What can it be called? Maybe the APA can offer a little help on this one. But I'm being seriously. I'm not trying to be facetious or demeaning. I'm genuinely interested in hearing some ideas on this.

Well
Take care


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses