GirlChat #542324
Re: did either of you read the article?
Posted by Markaba on 2011-October-25 19:05:13 EDT, Tuesday
In reply to did either of you read the article? posted by Baldur on 2011-October-25 10:03:52 EDT, Tuesday
Alright, fair enough. Sorry, I jumped the gun on that one.
Furthermore, although Foster was initially charged with forcible rape, those charges were dismissed - which suggests they didn't happen.
He clearly plea bargained. He plead guilty to lesser charges (rape without force, which can still be nonconsensual--I suspect that's the case here; there was no consent, but the child just didn't fight back or struggle), but initially his charges included forcible rape and sexual battery. Regardless of the victim's age, that means there was no consent. Is it really that hard for you guys to stretch your minds around that concept? He forced her, several times. That's what happened.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: did either of you read the article? - AK47 on 2011-October-26 12:59:25 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- plea bargains - Baldur on 2011-October-26 09:17:11 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- not to mention that - qtns2di4 on 2011-October-26 21:20:57 EDT, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: did either of you read the article? - griffith on 2011-October-25 19:45:54 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)