well, crap...

I deleted a post of yours because of a subject line that was patently offensive.

Yes, but that subject line was not mine.

The presence of employees, family, etc, etc essentially guarantees that the vigorously-ensuing coitus in a ballpit was entirely a status offense, rather than just "probably just a" status offense in the same way your conception could have been an act of violence, but the identically-unspecified case is presumed by default to have not been.

Dare you to edit the actual offensive subject line. It's within the FAQ to do so; under international law, phrasing which "incites hatred against a group" is illegal under the CoG, meaning that by carrying slander in what is by preponderance provably a mere status offense makes GC criminally liable, ironically, for incitement of hatred against the nations of service at florencia and the west pacific.

But me, I did not type that subject line. I just refused to honor a criminal act where it was disproven to preponderance, rather than merely refuted by presumption of innocence - as was, in fact, my legal requirement; "complicity," or honoring or refusing the refusal to honor, is also a criminal offense in incitement to hatred.

LGs is right; it is a duty, a prudence, and a liberation to familiarize one's self with the actual bare-bones foundational documents and theory of law; the CoG, the Genevas, the theories of statehood. There was an offensive subject line there; care to do something about it?

Basic legal requirements inform us that any offense in mine was merely inherited, and that any less vigorous contempt - "discomplicity," perhaps, which is different from conspiracy or collaboration - would in fact have made me a criminal actor in ommission.

Go ahead and edit it. 'n yes, if it is your actual desire, I can go over the foundational laws line-by-line if you want. Seek not the messenger. ;)

But thanks. 'n yeah, it was a -nt message, so it's not like any content of value was lost; your notice of deletion may likely also serve as equal evidence that I met the minimum legal requirement.

Thanks.