The same mistake the antis make

I fantasize all the time with penetrating girls in all three usual openings that teleiophile heterosexual men also use (ok ok, not all the time - but it sure is there when I fantasize about a girl, and I do not make any effort to stop the fantasy). That does not mean that (legality aside), if I had a consenting girl on my bed I would do it. I fantasize, but also realize that it would probably hurt her physically if I actually tried, and possibly in a way that would be painful and probably dangerous for longer than just the moment of trying. Of course, same as fantasy does not have any laws against kiddie sex, fantasy has girls that don't get hurt. Of course, I know I happen to live in another place, and I am able to refrain as much for the latter reason as I am for the former.

All that said, prohibition itself is, though not totally, partly to blame. Without prohibition, a girl could be allowed to experiment with penetration since an early age and progressively at her own pace. (Gosh, there are anal thermometers for newborns, aren't there?). The end result is that she would be ready for penetration by an adult male much earlier than our over-virginal girls are now. And by the way, anally earlier than missionary, because every single time they go potty helps them with that even if not consciously, or not intended. Of course, this practice is also, at least for the time being, completely a fantasy - if in a different way to my imaginary girls who simply don't get hurt.