GirlChat #545001
Thanks Dante. But I do think we'd achieve
Posted by Stahntii on 2011-December-06 01:05:12 EST, Tuesday
In reply to Changing terms without changing minds? posted by Dante on 2011-December-05 07:45:35 EST, Monday
And you can't compare it to the word gay or nigger, and the prejudism once (and to a degree - still) associated with those words. The difference is that many believe a PEDO to be something totally other than what it is, where-as GAY and NIGGER meant just what they were....a homo, and a dark-colored person from African regions, and that is what they were hater for (what they were). But we are hated not only for what we are, but more so for what we are not. That is a difference plenty worth mentioning. If people thought pedo only meant what it truly is, then I'd say it's fine to use it and stand by it. But as long as it means things like what I mentioned in first paragraph, it is self-abusive to use it; very counterproductive to our fight.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- I vehemently disagree. - qtns2di4 on 2011-December-06 03:37:05 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- Ping Qtns, and anyone who's interested - Stahntii on 2011-December-06 22:04:04 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: Ping Qtns, and anyone who's interested - qtns2di4 on 2011-December-07 12:38:08 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- i guess I didn't realize that such false - Stahntii on 2011-December-08 19:18:18 EST, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Ping Qtns, and anyone who's interested - qtns2di4 on 2011-December-07 12:38:08 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Ping Qtns, and anyone who's interested - Stahntii on 2011-December-06 22:04:04 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)