GirlChat #545220
Re: Some reading you should do
Posted by Little Girl Lover on 2011-December-09 09:03:52 EST, Friday
In reply to Re: Some reading you should do posted by Dissident on 2011-December-07 17:15:27 EST, Wednesday
Most of the worst stuff I saw looked very unprofessional. I don't know who took the pictures but I would assume they were someone the girls knew. That stuff was certainly not done by pros.
Most of the cp out there when I was looking was the old stuff from varies magazines. It was legal at the time it was made and the kids looked like they were having fun.
bands of organized crime whom the LEOs can never prove actually exist,
I would suspect the majority of the so called cp produced professionally is content like the LS Models. I personally don't think of it as cp but legally where I live it is. So that takes presidents.
Even in the days when I was trolling for content like the LS models I never really came across that many true CP sites. Yes there were some, but very few. A lot of so called sites on the top 100 types were nothing but a bunch of pop ups that got you nowhere. There were message boards with back doors into some HCCP sites but most of these basically had the same content. There wasn't a lot of different stuff.
I've never joined or been approached to join one of these so called pedophile rings that trades many thousands of pictures (so says the LEA) but I do have a hard time believing the LEA when describing these busts. They talk of new content in the thousands being confiscated during the raids. I'm not saying there isn't any new content because I'm sure there is but I would venture most of it is the stuff that's been circulating on line for years.
is not done by organized criminals who kidnap kids, but by older family members.
I would agree. As I said the stuff I had the displeasure of viewing was not professional.
The other type of so called Lolita was the lower budget version that had girls that weren't as pretty as the LS Model. Those girls looked like girls who most likely lived in the streets or were very poor. They were dirty and had hollow expressions. From what I read the girls did this just to eat. They did it so they could survive. But I guess society would rather just see them starve to death then pose nude.
LITTLE GIRL LOVER
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Thank you for these insights!-nt - Dissident on 2011-December-09 10:13:52 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)