philos. Levay and Crowley on AOC ,my interperat

Hey guys , I found this article stating that Aliester Crowley did NOT ,in fact ,condome sex with infants ! WOW ! What a coincidence ,neither do I ! Well ,actually this is an article about 12 myths debunct about Uncle Al on Aleister Crowley 2012 ,and he gives a VERY ,VERY vague defence that he may or may not have condoned pedo.... though he was not the sort of guy to rave about age of concent or the exact definiton of rape .

acts invasive of another individuals equal rights are implicitly self-aggressions. Such acts as rape, and the ASSULT or seduction of INFANTS, may therefore be justly regarded as offences against the Law of Liberty, and repressed in the interests of that Law.

Since Crowley was strongly opposed to centralised rule of government , he didnt really like laws as they were written ,nor forse or the idea of someone making someone do something against their freewill ,like here

To use legal or financial constraint to compel either abstention or submission, is entirely horrible, unnatural and absurd.
This and the article beforehand , leads to the conclusion that anysort of "age of concent "or "banning" of willful sexuality" should be entirely forbidden ,accept for in cases of small children or "infants" as he stated ,which therefore leads us to the conclusion ,once again ,noting the careful usage of the word "infant "(not child or youth) he found having sex with "a child during the earliest period of its life, especially before he or she can walk" rather than the old legal definition of a minor "
Law . a person who is not of full age, especially one who has not reached the age of 18 years; a minor" judging from the fact that Uncle Al hated formal laws and costomes though this might have extended to the realm of elementry school children as "infants" as well . Iam sure that Uncle Al did NOT take much heed to the actual legal definition of minor or age of 18 being an adult.

Sauce: http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/infant

My personal moral code is taken from a mixture of levayan and Crowleyan tenents as well as Taoism and even wicca.

Lets look at Dr> Levays possible view on the subject of MAA's and underage sex shall we?

In the 11 Satanic Rules of the Earth ( most of which I follow , but I tend to be too talkative to follow 1. and 2. ) there are some pretty simple rules or commandments to follw to live a decent life and amongst them are 9.Do not harm little children and 5.Do not make sexual advances unless given the mating signal (what is that supposed to mean? I THINK it means dont try to make a sexual move unless the person is showing visable signs of arousal or premittance ,like you feal her hormones ...or whatever). Okay , I might be interested inand fascinated by little girls but I would never do anything to harm them as I wouldnt intentionally harm a cyoot widdle Kitteh.And I can hope that you guys wouldnt either (girl LOVERS not girl HURTERS) .Now ,that can pretty much rule out 9. (Though I have given my little brother nuggies and wet willies before , does that count as violating that ?Lol)

5. Okay ,now this one gets a little different.This assumes thatthe girl is readyto mate,psychologically as well as physically and also desires you sexually . Well , when ever that is ,this statisfies the dictates of this rule of their morality ,though NATURE has set the AoC to puberty , whatever age that is (unless\ can willingly and pleasurably engage in sexual intercourse prior to puberty? I do not know , but all I know is that nature has inplanted the desire at this age and they are physically maturing( though I dont nessessarily think that this is a good age to get pregnant or nessessarily loose ones vcard , this happens naturally at this time for many kids).Thus ,I would finally conclude that both Anton Levay and Uncle Al said that ,according to nature, puberty is the youngest one should have sex .What do YOU guys think?