More

Hi,
in fact I think the proper way the wiki article on "child sexual abuse" should start is something along these lines, if we really want to stay objective and informative, which is what Wikipedia is supposed to be:

The phrase "child sexual abuse" generally denotes a widespread belief by medical and legal organizations (therefore having a high influence and authority on the population's own beliefs and culture) that any and all sexual acts between a child and a teenager or adult is always automatically and unquestionably abuse and harmful, and this based on studies mostly, if not always, made within medical and legal institutions, limiting themselves to a narrow and restricted range of events (based on the results of cases coming from these medical and legal institutions, themselves generally being the consequences of legal impositions which creates a tendency towards negative data, forming a deep vicious cycle, and resulting in a one-sided biased view on the subject of transgenerational sexuality);

What do you think?
I tried to tell it like it is, it might insult these 'medical and legal institutions' though (or the ones who drafted that wiki article), but I don't care;
But anyways, does anyone here gives a damn?... :p

Love2uall