although, i just think it's funny how you say that it inflames the non's when we talk of our sexual attraction to girls....yet in the very next breath you say they are sexy.
if they are sexy, doesn't that mean you are sexually attracted to them? hence, you would like to have sex with these little girls?
You just gave a perfect example of how I didn't go overboard with acknowledging my physical attraction to these girls, and you did, however slightly, and probably not as far as you would like to have gone. Let me get something straight with you here, dude. There is nothing wrong with acknowledging our physical attraction to these girls, and for saying they are sexy without going overboard on that point, or on the use of that word (due to its emotional effect on those who read it), and in fact it would be disingenuous for us to do otherwise. But going on and on about our lost for these girls and our slavering upon looking at their bodies for an entire post--whether it's a long or short post--and saying little to nothing else about the many things to admire about these girls and their performance in the show, and making overt or borderline graphic comments about what we would like to do to them, is very different from what I did, and what the respectful posters here who truly admire all aspects of LGs and/or AGs would do.
If you mention a girl is beautiful and attractive, it's obvious you wouldn't mind being intimate with her; saying "I want to have sex with her" is not only uncalled for due to how much more info than is necessary you are giving out in that case, but it also implies that all of us want to have specifically intercourse with these girls, or would expect that of them if we could date them legally, which is very much not the intention of a good number of us, including myself. Saying "sex" and only "sex" is making use of a potentially loaded word that can have very specific connotations that the writer is not intending to make. In fact, I would actually prefer making out with any girls I was dating than full blown intercourse, which makes it perfectly acceptable, and even accurate, not to use the word "sex," but to use other terms in its place.
look i know i keep harping on this
You are harping on this because you are irked over the fact that I called out anyone who acts a certain way towards girls on this board on their behavior, and it hit a nerve with you, and you are now reading my posts looking for every opportunity to jump down my throat about this subject, trying to find instances of me contradicting myself. That much is obvious, so let's be honest about that.
but i have never been one to come on here and solely speak of my sexual attraction to little girls. and i know that the "deviant intentions" reference was to the board as a whole in order to not give the non's fire power but let's be real man...the non's are not ever going to be on our side...there is only one thing they are concerned with and that's that we want to have sex with little girls. and that's all they will focus on.
Be a man about this? Excuse me, but I have always acknowledged the sexual component of my attraction to girls, I am not ashamed of it, and none of the rest of us need be either. However, it's far from the only aspect of girls I am attracted to, and all deserve acknowledgement, otherwise we give the incorrect impression that our attraction to girls is far more narrow than is actually the case. The sexual aspect of my attraction takes place in a certain context that is not removed from the emotional, social, and aesthetic components that make up the fulcrum of my attraction, which is why I don't feel the need to go on and on about one without acknowledging the others.
The Non's will "never" be on our side? Your cynicism will be ignored, because it implies that this is the one type of prejudice in the world that will never gain acceptance, and also ignoring the fact that it's a relatively recent form of prejudice to pervade world culture. Do your research before giving into defeatism.
And are you implying that since that is the only thing Non's tend to focus on when they visit our sites that this somehow makes it perfectly okay for us to pander to such negative expectations, and to acquiesce to the common media stereotypes by going on and on with all the lurid and salacious details that the public thinks we want to do? What we say, and how we say it, in public does indeed matter, and I am speaking here as a MAP who has been "out" ever since I realized I was a MAP about 15 years ago. So don't try to speak to me with greater authority on this than you clearly have.
you took that and ran with it...and you can say all you want about my past posts but the reality is since i got my first warning or 2, which was years ago about accepted speech here at GC i have been very careful about the way i describe events in my life.
Which I'm sure upsets you greatly, so you can't explicate all the licentious detail on this board that you would love to go into.
as you've eluded to in your opinion i may not be a real gler just a fetishist or someone practicing my erotic stories to gain attention....except you seem to ignore the thousands of words i have spoken here at GC on the joy and fulfillment i get from simply spending time with a girl laughing, playing games, drawing, looking into her eyes, listening to her and having conversations, singing and dancing. you disregard my posts about the deep love and respect i have for lg's...my longing to fall in love with one and being loved in return....
I haven't ignored them, I sincerely haven't seen them, or at least not emphasized enough in your posts to stand out, but that may indeed be an oversight on my part, and if such is the case, then I will owe you an apology. But if those extra-sexual aspects are so important to you, then why is it so important to you to lecture me to feel free to be as salacious as I want in my statements of admiration of girls, and while using the tired, cynical excuses of how what we say doesn't matter, how the Nons will never change their attitude towards us, etc., et al., to justify it? If I am wrong about you, then I promise to read your posts more carefully from now on, and if you show that you do indeed have an emotional, social, and spiritual/aesthetic component to your attraction to girls, I will apologize to you and give you all the props you deserve. Posts like this is what make me suspicious of you. And since this was intended as a happy post, you could have gone into this elsewhere, or started a new thread. Please keep that in mind.
Also keep this in mind: one thing I have learned after 11 years in this community is that 99% of the male posters on this board tend to get exactly as much respect as they earn. If they are simply misunderstood, or have poor social skills or manner of conveying themselves that leads to some initial misunderstandings with the board (and this does happen), the board members here tend to find that out eventually and re-evaluate their early assessments of the poster in question.
you only pay attention to the words i speak that further your argument...and that is exactly what the non's and anti's do....practice what you preach.
Which implies that you think I have a dislike for you that makes no logical sense, and that I am thus purposely selective about what I read in your posts so as to acquire artificial "ammo" to make allegations against you, as if I wouldn't think anyone else on the board would notice this if I did it. If I truly had a tendency to be unfair to random posters in such a petty manner, you can rest assured I would not have earned the respect I have on this board over the past 11 years. Start being more respectful, stop telling other posters to "man up" when they do speak respectfully about girls, stop making posts with clearly ridiculous exaggerations, stop making tired justifications for speaking disrespectfully ("the Nons are never gonna respect us, do it doesn't matter what we say here!"), and then you can begin practicing what you are preaching here.