Re: Contrast

1. Most of the reviews covered the whole album, rather than the specific song you mentioned.

2. Most of the reviews covered the whole experience, not the lyrics judged independently of the music, which was what Griffith and I were discussing.

3. Reviewers are frequently "encouraged" in various ways to write positive reviews for mediocre works, and public relations firms have been known to finagle search results in their clients' favor, thus they cannot be trusted even if one presumes that their words have weight.

4. Regardless of all the above, a reviewer can be wrong or simply have simplistic tastes, which are not relevant to the discussion Griffith and I were having.

In short, non sequitur, non sequitur, appeal to authority, and De gustibus non disputandum est.