GirlChat #548558
Isn't that a teleiophile? nt
Posted by Hypersonic on 2012-January-24 01:53:24 EST, Tuesday
In reply to Creation of a needed term (essay) Part 1 posted by Dissident on 2012-January-24 01:34:14 EST, Tuesday
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Teleiophile isn't an accurate word for this... - griffith on 2012-January-24 08:09:58 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- One thing more - griffith on 2012-January-24 09:45:37 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- I always used to say that it was Kurt Freund - griffith on 2012-January-24 09:30:49 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Please note my response to FreeThinkerGL-nt - Dissident on 2012-January-24 04:56:32 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Isn't that a teleiophile? nt - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 04:36:05 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 45)
- Re: Isn't that a teleiophile? - griffith on 2012-January-24 09:15:23 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - Dissident on 2012-January-24 04:55:47 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 43)
- Huh? - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 06:47:01 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 12)
- Re: Huh? - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 07:29:31 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- It's not a prob... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:32:07 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: It's not a prob... - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 07:36:07 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- It's not a prob... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:32:07 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Um... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:00:18 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- I noticed - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 17:04:37 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- Re: I noticed - Dissident on 2012-January-28 05:41:35 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Your sigpic looks like a bra. -nt- - griffith on 2012-January-24 18:28:45 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- And a CONVERTIBLE one at that. - Lil'Grundoon on 2012-January-25 18:04:03 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- You are a perv...:-)-nt- - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 18:30:50 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: I noticed - griffith on 2012-January-24 17:38:25 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- agreed - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 18:25:37 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- I noticed - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 17:04:37 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- You always say it better than me - Trucker on 2012-January-24 06:59:57 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Huh? - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 07:29:31 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- do you mean ''gerbil''? (nt) - qtns2di4 on 2012-January-24 06:20:45 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 12)
- Thanks for your fine contribution to this thread - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:27:54 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- While we're on the subject of labels (seriously) - Trucker on 2012-January-24 06:57:49 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 10)
- Respectful response - Dissident on 2012-January-24 08:13:39 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- Re: Respectful response - Hypersonic on 2012-January-24 11:10:12 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Okay, but... - Trucker on 2012-January-24 10:07:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Okay, but... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 11:26:19 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- A question about taftohebephilia - Hypersonic on 2012-January-24 11:51:55 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: A question about taftohebephilia - Dissident on 2012-January-28 05:49:14 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- That doesn't work - Hypersonic on 2012-January-28 05:53:53 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: That doesn't work - Dissident on 2012-January-29 06:51:18 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: That doesn't work - Sexiest GLer of All Time on 2012-January-29 07:01:22 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- That seems like it will confuse people. nt - Hypersonic on 2012-January-29 06:53:00 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: That doesn't work - Dissident on 2012-January-29 06:51:18 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- That doesn't work - Hypersonic on 2012-January-28 05:53:53 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- Re: A question about taftohebephilia - Dissident on 2012-January-28 05:49:14 EST, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- A question about taftohebephilia - Hypersonic on 2012-January-24 11:51:55 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: Okay, but... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 11:26:19 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- Respectful response - Dissident on 2012-January-24 08:13:39 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- While we're on the subject of labels (seriously) - Trucker on 2012-January-24 06:57:49 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 10)
- Thanks for your fine contribution to this thread - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:27:54 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 11)
- My guys got a label for ya! - Trucker on 2012-January-24 05:53:38 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- If such an individual exists... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:13:22 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- And I wish you would get a clue - Trucker on 2012-January-24 06:32:05 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 4)
- You need to hire Sherlock Holmes yourself - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:14:55 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- S. Holmes! I love her! - griffith on 2012-January-24 10:50:21 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- I dislike your thinking - Trucker on 2012-January-24 07:38:44 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- You need to read my most recent response - Dissident on 2012-January-24 08:31:59 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- You need to hire Sherlock Holmes yourself - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:14:55 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- And I wish you would get a clue - Trucker on 2012-January-24 06:32:05 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 4)
- If such an individual exists... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:13:22 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 05:40:59 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 9)
- Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 06:29:47 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:23:26 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Edit: Entited 'Re: Lables' -nt - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 06:31:25 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:21:50 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: 'teleiophile' - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 05:58:07 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Yes, it CAN be used that way... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:25:25 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Yes, it CAN be used that way... - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 06:41:04 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Thank you for offering further research... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:30:36 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Thank you for offering further research... - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 20:04:46 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Thank you for offering further research... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:30:36 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Yes, it CAN be used that way... - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 06:41:04 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Yes, it CAN be used that way... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:25:25 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 06:29:47 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Huh? - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 06:47:01 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 12)