Re: Isn't that a teleiophile? nt

GirlChat #548569

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Re: Isn't that a teleiophile? nt

Posted by FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 04:36:05 EST, Tuesday

In reply to Isn't that a teleiophile? nt posted by Hypersonic on 2012-January-24 01:53:24 EST, Tuesday

Yes, for some reason. Dissy uses that term incorrectly. And, I've been wanting to bring this to his attention, as his essays has this incorrect uses too.

I've yet to read the whole essay, but this has always been the term used to describe minors that are attracted to adults. Of course, we have two other terms coined by Lindsay Ashford (not sure if they could be helpful here or not).

Teleiophilia (from Greek teleios, "full grown") is erotic or sexual interest in adults. Teleiophilia is not restricted by the teleiophile's age, from what I've read. Sex-specific attractions to persons are "gynephilia and androphilia". Teleiophilia was also called adultophilia.

Note: Part of that last bit is from Wiki. Hence, how I learned.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

Re: Isn't that a teleiophile? - griffith on 2012-January-24 09:15:23 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - Dissident on 2012-January-24 04:55:47 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 43)
- Huh? - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 06:47:01 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 12)
  - Re: Huh? - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 07:29:31 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 2)
    - It's not a prob... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:32:07 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
      - Re: It's not a prob... - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 07:36:07 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
  - Um... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:00:18 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)
    - I noticed - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 17:04:37 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
      - Re: I noticed - Dissident on 2012-January-28 05:41:35 EST, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
      - Your sigpic looks like a bra. -nt- - griffith on 2012-January-24 18:28:45 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
        
        And a CONVERTIBLE one at that. - Lil'Grundoon on 2012-January-25 18:04:03 EST, Wednesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        You are a perv...:-)-nt- - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 18:30:50 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
      - Re: I noticed - griffith on 2012-January-24 17:38:25 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        agreed - Sancho Panza on 2012-January-24 18:25:37 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
  - You always say it better than me - Trucker on 2012-January-24 06:59:57 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- do you mean ''gerbil''? (nt) - qtns2di4 on 2012-January-24 06:20:45 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 12)
  - Thanks for your fine contribution to this thread - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:27:54 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 11)
    - While we're on the subject of labels (seriously) - Trucker on 2012-January-24 06:57:49 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 10)
      - Respectful response - Dissident on 2012-January-24 08:13:39 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 9)
        
        Re: Respectful response - Hypersonic on 2012-January-24 11:10:12 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        Okay, but... - Trucker on 2012-January-24 10:07:30 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)
        
        Re: Okay, but... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 11:26:19 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 6)
        
        A question about taftohebephilia - Hypersonic on 2012-January-24 11:51:55 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 5)
        
        Re: A question about taftohebephilia - Dissident on 2012-January-28 05:49:14 EST, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 4)
        
        That doesn't work - Hypersonic on 2012-January-28 05:53:53 EST, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 3)
        
        Re: That doesn't work - Dissident on 2012-January-29 06:51:18 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 2)
        
        Re: That doesn't work - Sexiest GLer of All Time on 2012-January-29 07:01:22 EST, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        That seems like it will confuse people. nt - Hypersonic on 2012-January-29 06:53:00 EST, Sunday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- My guys got a label for ya! - Trucker on 2012-January-24 05:53:38 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
  - If such an individual exists... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:13:22 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 5)
    - And I wish you would get a clue - Trucker on 2012-January-24 06:32:05 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 4)
      - You need to hire Sherlock Holmes yourself - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:14:55 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 3)
        
        S. Holmes! I love her! - griffith on 2012-January-24 10:50:21 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
        
        I dislike your thinking - Trucker on 2012-January-24 07:38:44 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        You need to read my most recent response - Dissident on 2012-January-24 08:31:59 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 05:40:59 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 9)
  - Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 06:29:47 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
    - Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:23:26 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
    - Edit: Entited 'Re: Lables' -nt - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 06:31:25 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)
  - Re: That is not how we use 'teleiophile' here - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:21:50 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
  - Re: 'teleiophile' - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 05:58:07 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 4)
    - Yes, it CAN be used that way... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 06:25:25 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 3)
      - Re: Yes, it CAN be used that way... - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 06:41:04 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
        
        Thank you for offering further research... - Dissident on 2012-January-24 07:30:36 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 1)
        
        Re: Thank you for offering further research... - FreeThinkerGL on 2012-January-24 20:04:46 EST, Tuesday - (1 / 0 / 0)