Are you serious?

Many people here, and elsewhere, use the term "Feminazi". Why shouldn't such a word be used against evil people who want to destroy the lives of men and children?

You tell me to be respectful when you've just spent your posting day yelling at Qtns(sp?). Sorry, just because someone doesn't agree with you doesn't mean they aren't being respectful. I don't see why debate and dialogue cannot continue just because one person doesn't like a term being used.

Again, it seems like you do support such misandric, super ultra neo-feminist attitudes, which is why such a term would offend you. Maybe I'm wrong. Sorry if that's the case.

So, I am sorry for using that term and I won't use it any more with you. Also, I'm sorry if I did make incorrect and blatant assumptions about you. But I feel I do deserve such a response, and if I don't get it after this, it will be clear to me that my assumptions were correct.

You cannot just avoid this by countering with another question; "What about the barbarians who want to destroy the lives of women and children?". Such a statement could be called a strawman in itself, since as we've pointed out, efforts to protect women and children are in progress as we speak, and at the expense of males and Child Lovers in general. And that brings me back to my original point, more or less: Why should males have to suffer just because females are also suffering? Is it merely a counter attack - a revenge ploy? Why if something bad is happening on one side of the world must the opposite, of equal horror, also happen on the other side of the world, and eventually be brought in to all sides of the world because it matters so much who started the fight? Is it about bullying? Is it about an eye for an eye? I don't get it, and I'm just rambling now. I'd be much more content if you ignore this post and respond to the other one. Or both.

After all, I have seen you claim that females are vastly superior to males. Such unclean thinking got humanity in the mucky situation it's in today. I still don't get whether or not it's about an eye for an eye? Males should suffer for the mistakes other males make? That's kind of like Christian Extremist thinking which states that the Jews were killed by Hitler as a punishment from God for the mistake other Jews made centuries ago in crucifying Jesus. I hope you can see how this Hitler analogy relates directly in this context to the infantile and deliberately offensive terminology.

Then again, I'm just making more blatant assumptions now which would not have been necessary if you could clarify your stance.

Sorry for the trouble. I hope you are not upset.