GirlChat #558082


Yeah and also

Posted by GL_in_lyrics on 2012-June-17 11:24:26 EDT, Sunday
In reply to That test was not relevant posted by Seamus on 2012-June-17 09:39:36 EDT, Sunday

  Views: 1    Likes: 0     
I see the faces of many boys and girls. Most boys are way too ugly looking (for my tastes) that I could ever mistake him for a girl. Even if I'd mistake that face for a girl, it wouldn't be one I'm attracted to. Now I do suppose there are many instances where most girls could be made to look like an extremely feminine boy. But short hair and so many other factors would repulse me.

There are exceptions to every rule. Heck, back in the "Leave Britney Alone" days I saw a picture of Chris Crocker's ass and I thought it was a woman's and it sort of turned me on. But I'm not gay and sexual attraction is about much more than looks no matter how you cut it. Even men can be made to look like women and vice-versa.

Some people just have too much faith in manipulated statistics and reports.

As for chests, girls are typically built wider and thinner in specific areas, as well as other factors mentioned.

Speaking of factors, there are many of them regarding the issue of attraction. There's the way your object of attraction dresses, behaves, grooms themselves, etc. What's between their legs is also a major issue, as most people are attracted to one and repulsed by the other. When it all comes down to it, it matters to me most what's in a girl's head. If some mad scientist's experiment switched the body of a LG with a LB, I'd still rather be with the girl trapped in the boy's body than with a grown woman (or man). And it would probably be very difficult for me to be with a boy who is literally trapped in a girl's body, even though he might look sexy and 100% identical to a girl. In most cases you'd notice a behavioral switch that completely changes the way the body moves and behaves. Males and females are vastly different from each other, they look vastly different, and both genders are wired to see each other that way. And I do not mean to imply by this that I cannot be attracted to Tom Boys or that I'll find a little boy sexy if he wishes he were a girl.

And yes, the fact that it's taboo to *see little girls topless* does make it more arousing if/when a GL sees it. But truly their chests are different. Their faces are different as well even though it can be manipulated to appear otherwise. I don't mean to say I believe in black and whites. There are certainly some little boys that would have better looking chests than some girls, but that doesn't mean I'd get stiff from it or that I'd want to look.

Attraction does know the boundary of gender for most people and it will continue to unless or until we erase the differences in gender altogether. But that will make for a damn boring world, and in the end won't matter because there will still be those attracted to tough, macho persons, and those attracted to sweet, doll-like persons. And there would be many other issues to come from this as well. I'd say to embrace the differences in male and female and not try to change them, even though Feminists are ashamed and hateful of the nature of the female gender and envious of the male gender.

:-)

But yes, I agree with you Seamus.


This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses