Re: That test was not relevant

to what GL_Lyrics posted; he was talking about chests, not heads.

It was quite relevant. We are better at identifying faces than anything else; this is genetic. If we can't even separate girl's and boy's faces, there is little hope we would be able identify girl's chests.

Try posting pictures of chests and see how many we get right.

Oh sure, I'll post pics of girl's naked chests. That's not against GC's rules or anything . . . :-S You know very well I can't do that, Seamus. What about more legal body parts? If this claim is true, then it should apply to all their parts, not just their chests. Or are you guys just chest-fixated? Nah, you're girl lovers, right? So pick another part (feet, maybe?) and I will gladly set up another test. Hell, I'll do the face test again, just for you guys.

And while the risque' factor does enter into it somewhat, the fact remains that girl's chests are NOT the same as boy's chests; I can tell the difference at a glance, and I think that most people could also.

Well, no doubt you guys believe you are experts at IDing girl's chests, but you've never really been challenged on it. Bear in mind I am talking about very young children here--under age 9. Over that age I would tend to agree for the most part, as I stated in my initial response. But younger than that? Nah . . .