Re: Some relevant criticism, some not

You are making a pretty sweeping claim, and I challenge you to prove it.

Sure. Remind me of this the next time I visit New Guinea, please.

Other than that, this was intended to be the kind of criticism that your test would find in the peer review process for publishing. I personally think the idea is fascinating and relevant. I just think it needs polishing if it is to be considered scientifically defensible. Also, I think that whatever the result is, it allows for interesting speculation over what creates the pedophilic orientation, and in what ways it differs from the teleiophilic orientation, and also for GLs and BLs from each other. And you and I share all of these questions and interests, scientifically speaking. Even if we do differ in our preferred aetiologies.

I don't think Seamus and Lyrics will do any better than the rest did, though. They too are going to bump against the limitations of the test, and (not to minimize) their own overconfidence in being able to "pass".

Btw, today I saw a tomboy that was perfect for your test. She did remind me a little of an adult lesbian friend, too.