Re: Yes

Perhaps you don't have the experiences I have, but you have the capacity for love that people like me have. Your sigpic shows it.

No, I would disagree just a tiny bit with what you wrote:

if he proceeds in love and with respect and she with tolerance.

She won't proceed with tolerance. She will proceed, if she does proceed, with love, as well. Any other way is abuse. It is this precise point that society fails to see. Or, would rather not see.

True, "frickin society" does not allow behaviour it deems unacceptable. Its motives are honourable, but the end result is still immoral. It is for this reason, this reason alone, that I am glad you are lacking in the experience I have. And it is this reason that I am no longer practicing illegal activities today. My little partner was injured by me through the philosophy of society. Society says that what I did was bad (true) but they amplified it, horrified (verb) it, made her a victim (true) but amplified and horrified (verb, again) that, too. It is this changing of perception that my little partner underwent, from a position of "he kissed parts of me that society finds unacceptable", to "he is a horrid monster and was victimizing me."

If anyone can guarantee there is "full duplex" love between two people and that, considering "frickin society's" proclivity to think and react the way it does, can guarantee "frickin society" will NEVER become involved in any way (almost impossible), then the experience I have should be duplicated by all who wish it.

There is, then, the use of the word "almost".