This IS the "TL version," but I think you may have meant a summarized one, didn't you?
In order to get to the comments area at the bottom of the thread you would have had to either read it all, or just scroll down without verifying if the data contained is information you already know. I wonder which option you chose.
I'll try and be nice
WAIT!!! Let me jot this down on my calendar!!!
but what you've stringed together sans new members
HUH??? Sans new members? Do you understand what the word "sans" means? What does the lack or absence of new members have to do with this thread?
is a lot of information/ common knowledge tons of GLers have heard time and time and time again...
Tons of GLers? They're weighing GLers now to establish what they know? I guess I didn't get that memo.
This information was posted for anyone who isn't an expert or knows everything about the subject, and because someone else ... NOT YOU ... asked for it.
I'm curious about something. If you've heard it time and time again, and already know everything about female childhood orgasm, why are you even reading this thread or posting a comment?
If this thread isn't important or useful to you ... ignore it. You ignore plenty of OTHER threads, don't you? Why not this one?
I'd hardly call it research.../
Hmmm ... hardly call it research, huh?
Research: [Noun]
- the systematic investigation into and study of materials and sources in order to establish facts and reach new conclusions
- systematic investigation to establish facts or principles or to collect information on a subject
- careful or diligent search
- studious inquiry or examination
- investigation aimed at the discovery and interpretation of facts
- the collecting of information about a particular subject
- Scholarly or scientific investigation or inquiry
Yeah ... I see your point. None of the information I included could be classified by any of the items listed above. You're right. Good catch.
What good will it do to have yet another thread on this?
Gee ... there's a thought. Never introduce information that's been discussed before, even if knowledge of such information isn't available, ie. never post a new thread about a subject that's been posted before. I'm sure YOU'VE never done that before.
For the record, I tried to do a search, but ... GCSearch is only available to registered users who also have chat privileges.
Since I haven't been a member of GC long enough to obtain chat privileges, perhaps I should have waited another two or more years to consider posting this thread.
Thank you for being nice and helping me understand what you know about the concepts of an article's length and your disinterest in reading it, Old French terms, weights and measures, your empirical knowledge of prepubescent female structure, medicine, and physiology, what the word "research" means, and the value of not introducing previously discussed topics. I genuinely appreciate your help, KBA.
I'll be sure to come to you every time I'm considering posting something, because I don't want you to be offended or have to waste your time reading it ... even if at least one other person in the world doesn't know everything, like you do.
Now ... without any animosity, I'd recommend you grow up just a little bit more and reconsider flaming me simply because you believe you're more important than I am. Prove your manhood with your brain when you try to beat down an adversary rather than with a reproductive portion of your anatomy.
For the record ... as an assistant on the writing staff of another site I was asked to read and possibly participate a little bit here at GC to encourage intelligent members to contribute literary pieces to that site, not argue with anyone. I guess my mission isn't progressing very well, is it?