Two quick questions ...

If you learned something ... anything ... in the original post of this thread, then I'd politely ask for a little feedback.

In order to consider this topic for further investigation, or potential inclusion in VoA's e-Zine [or something similar], it needs to have enough going for it to be worthy of a broader, and potentially less accepting audience.

Was there information in the post that raised your eyebrows, caused you to shake your head in disbelief, or gain a new appreciation for an aspect of underage female human development you hadn't considered before?

Or was the collection of information boring hyperbole and media hogwash that caused you to question my intentions?

No response is just as telling as a dozen.